Simon Blackburn's Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy tours knowledge, mind, free will, God and ethics through Descartes, Hume and Kant. Reviewers praise its readability; a Mind reviewer faulted its treatment of knowledge.
Curious newcomers who want a topic-by-topic guide to the big questions of philosophy (knowledge, God, what to do) from an author with a point of view, and who are happy to dip into chapters rather than read in order.
Worth it if
Worth reading if you want a readable, example-driven first map of philosophy that you can enter at whichever chapter interests you, such as God, free will or reasoning, and you don't mind being argued with.
Skip if
Skip it if you want a neutral, even-handed catalogue of positions or a rigorous account of the theory of knowledge, since Blackburn takes sides and a Mind reviewer faulted his treatment of knowledge.
What readers & critics say
Reception leans positive: a student review on the University of Oxford site recommends it for its clear, engaging chapters, and the Oxford University Press page carries a Denver Post line praising its simple, clear, example-rich writing. The reservations are narrower, with a ResearchGate review warning that readers are sure to disagree with some of Blackburn's arguments and judgements.
Think is Simon Blackburn's topic-by-topic tour of philosophy, from knowledge and mind to free will, God and ethics, built around Descartes, Hume, Kant and Wittgenstein. Reviewers praise its clarity and energy, but it is a guide with a point of view rather than a neutral survey, and a Mind reviewer faulted its treatment of knowledge.
Is it worth reading?
Reviewers are largely warm. John Banville in The Irish Times called it a wonderfully stimulating, incisive introduction, and the Denver Post found it readable, with ideas carried by example and analogy. The caveats are specific: Mark Sainsbury in the journal Mind raised an objection to the theory of knowledge, though the sources we found do not give his grounds, and a ResearchGate review warns that readers will disagree with Blackburn's positions. It rewards readers who are happy to be argued with.
Similar books
The usual alternatives approach the same ground differently. Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy is a short, argumentative primer, while his History of Western Philosophy and Will Durant's The Story of Philosophy follow the subject chronologically. Jostein Gaarder's Sophie's World wraps the history in a novel, and Tom Butler-Bowdon's 50 Philosophy Classics works through major texts one by one. Think stands apart by organising the tour around problems rather than chronology. None of these pairings comes from the reviews of Think itself; they are standard companions for readers exploring the genre.
Who should read this?
It suits people who sense there are big questions out there but do not know how to approach them, and who want a guide with opinions. The topic-by-topic structure lets you begin wherever your curiosity is strongest. It is a weaker choice for anyone who wants an even-handed overview or a rigorous account of the theory of knowledge.
What age is it for?
Think is written for general adult readers rather than children, and no source we found gives a recommended age. Its difficulty comes from abstract arguments rather than mature content. Banville and the Denver Post describe the prose as stimulating and readable, but no review we found assesses it for younger readers.
About Simon Blackburn
Simon Blackburn was born in July 1944 in England, the son of Cuthbert Walter and Edna Blackburn. He attended Clifton College, Bristol (1957-62) and Trinity College, Cambridge, earning a B.A. in 1963. He married Angela Margaret Bowles in 1968 and has two children. His books include Think, Being Good, Plato's Republic: A Biography, How to Read Hume and Ethics: A Very Short Introduction.
How should I read it?
Reviewers suggest treating it as a book to enter at the point of curiosity. A student review on the Oxford site suggests reading the introduction and then jumping to the chapter that interests you, rather than going cover to cover. Each of the eight chapters covers its own territory, from Knowledge to What to Do, so skipping around does not lose the thread.
Is it a neutral survey or does Blackburn take sides?
A ResearchGate review warns that readers will disagree with Blackburn, and the book takes an argumentative stance. Reviewers split on whether that is a strength: Banville and the Sunday Times praise the clarity of the arguments, while a reader wanting an even-handed encyclopedia may be frustrated.
Summarize this book
Is it worth reading?
Who should read this?
What age is it for?
About Simon Blackburn
How should I read it?
Is it a neutral survey or does Blackburn take sides?
Summarize this book
Think moves through eight areas of philosophy in separate chapters: Knowledge, Mind, Free Will, The Self, God, Reasoning, The World and What to Do. Blackburn explains each area by narrating how Descartes, Hume, Kant and Wittgenstein tackled its key concepts. It opens on the childhood worry that the whole world might be a dream, and it argues throughout for the value of philosophy itself.
Follow up
Do I have to read the chapters in order?
How does the book end?
Synthesized from verified book data & published reviews · How we review
Ask LuvemBooks
What would you like to know about Think?
Answers come from our editorial notes on this book. If we haven't covered something, we'll say so.
Readers often ask
Our Review
We review the evidence: published critics, reader verdicts and BookTube reviews, gathered and weighed with AI assistance and edited by LuvemBooks, rather than one reader's first-hand take.
Simon Blackburn's Think has drawn praise as a stimulating, readable first map of philosophy, with the Irish Times critic John Banville calling it "thrilling". Its main caveat comes from a Mind reviewer who faulted the treatment of knowledge, and a ResearchGate review warns that readers will disagree with Blackburn's judgements.
What does Think cover?
Think is a general introduction to philosophy for readers who sense there are big questions out there but do not know how to approach them. Oxford's publisher copy lists knowledge, consciousness, fate, God, truth, goodness and justice as its territory.
The contents page gives the chapters: Knowledge, Mind, Free Will, The Self, God, Reasoning, The World and What to Do.
According to Wikipedia's summary, Blackburn moves through major fields by narrating how René Descartes, David Hume, Immanuel Kant and Ludwig Wittgenstein tackled the key concepts of each. Wikipedia lists epistemology, philosophy of mind, free will, political philosophy and philosophy of religion among the fields touched.
The book opens on a thought most people have had in childhood: "PERHAPS THE MOST unsettling thought many of us have, often quite early on in childhood, is that the whole world might be a dream." From there it argues, as Wikipedia puts it, for the value and importance of philosophy itself.
The Oxford paperback edition appeared in 2001, after the original 1999 hardback.
What did reviewers say about Think?
The warmest voices praise its clarity and energy. John Banville in The Irish Times, also quoted there, called it a "wonderfully stimulating, incisive" introduction to the pleasures and problems of philosophy.
The Denver Post, quoted in the same publisher material, said his writing is readable, driven by example and analogy.
That is a strong claim from a non-specialist, so it is best read as enthusiasm rather than measured appraisal.
The ResearchGate review praises the closing chapter, What to do, as deft and convincing. The same review warns that readers will disagree with Blackburn's arguments and judgements, which fits a book that argues positions rather than only surveying them.
Where does Think draw criticism?
The one named caveat comes from Mark Sainsbury, reviewing in the peer-reviewed journal Mind, who praised the book's writing overall but raised a specific objection to Blackburn's treatment of knowledge. Wikipedia's summary, which relays his review, does not record his grounds for that objection.
As a result, nothing here says whether the complaint is technical or a question of emphasis, and readers cannot learn that from the sources consulted.
The ResearchGate warning is a different kind of caveat: Blackburn takes sides, so a reader who wants a neutral catalogue of positions may be frustrated. Beginners who simply want to be pointed at the questions are less likely to mind.
Is Think worth reading?
Weighing these reviews, the tension is between an inviting survey and an author with opinions. The praise (Banville, the Sunday Times, the Denver Post) is for clarity and pleasure; the cautions (Sainsbury on knowledge, ResearchGate on disagreement) are for Blackburn's own judgements.
That points the book toward curious newcomers who want a guide with a point of view, and away from anyone who wants an even-handed encyclopedia.
A student's review on the University of Oxford site recommends dipping in rather than reading cover to cover: read the introduction, then jump to the chapter that interests you. That reviewer found the God chapter (Anselm, Aquinas and Hume's argument from design) clear and engaging, and the free will and reasoning chapters useful for later study in psychology and logic.
For comparison, Wikipedia notes that Anthony Quinton placed short books like Think within a new wave of professional philosophers writing for general readers. Critics reported that it found a sizable audience, with more than 30,000 hardcover copies sold and a follow-up on ethics, Being Good, commissioned by Oxford.
Which books are similar to Think?
If you want a different route into the same subject, the usual neighbours are Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy and his History of Western Philosophy, Jostein Gaarder's Sophie's World, Will Durant's The Story of Philosophy and Alain de Botton's The Consolations of Philosophy. None of these is a source-backed comparison from the reviews above; they are standard companions for readers exploring the genre.
Russell offers a short, argumentative primer, Gaarder wraps the history in a novel, Durant tells it through biography, and de Botton aims at philosophy as consolation.
Blackburn's distinct offer, per the reviews, is a topic-by-topic tour that favours problems over chronology.
Sources & Further Reading
The key facts and claims in this review are grounded in the retrieved, verified sources listed below.
Blackburn considers his introductory work Think to be among his proudest achievements, suggesting it may be the finest overview of the discipline since Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy. He was motivated to write it to share his enthusiasm for how philosophy deepens inquiries beyond the limits of natural sciences.
From our readers
Reader reviews
Be one of the first readers to answer.
Read it? Was it right for you?
Books like Think
Curated picks for readers who enjoyed Think, with our reasoning for each match.