The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss, and Long-Term Health by T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell cover

The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss, and Long-Term Health

by T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell

$12.82 on AmazonRead our full review

At a glance

First published2005
AudienceAdult
ISBN1941631568

About the Author

T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell

1 book reviewed

LuvemBooks Verdict

Best for

Readers curious about plant-based eating who want a research-grounded, population-level argument for reducing or eliminating animal products from their diet.

Worth it if

You want a structured scientific rationale — drawn from large-scale epidemiological data — for adopting a whole-food, plant-based diet, and you're comfortable reading one forceful perspective within an active scientific debate rather than a balanced survey of competing frameworks.

Skip if

You want a book that engages seriously with counterarguments, acknowledges the limits of correlational data, or represents the full complexity of current nutritional science — the Campbells' prosecutorial confidence leaves little room for that nuance.

What readers & critics say

According to Wikipedia, the book had sold over one million copies in the United States by October 2013, making it one of America's best-selling books about nutrition; that same source notes it is described as "loosely based" on the China–Cornell–Oxford Project, a characterisation that reflects longstanding methodological debate around the causal claims the authors build on its correlational data.

Sources: Wikipedia
4.7from 5,214 Amazon ratings— reader ratings, not a LuvemBooks score

Ask LuvemBooks

Was this helpful?

The China Study by T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell is a landmark, data-driven argument that a whole-food, plant-based diet can prevent and reverse chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, diabetes, and several cancers — drawing on the large-scale China–Cornell–Oxford Project to make its case to a general audience. One of America's best-selling nutrition books, with over a million copies sold, it succeeds as a compelling popular science argument for reducing or eliminating animal products. Readers seeking a balanced survey of nutritional science should note the book's prosecutorial tone and the sustained methodological debate its causal claims have attracted from nutrition researchers.
Is it worth reading?
For readers curious about plant-based eating or seeking a research-grounded rationale for reducing or eliminating animal products, The China Study remains one of the most thorough and widely read popular arguments available — and its translation into more than a dozen languages signals that the Campbells succeeded in communicating a complex epidemiological argument to a broad general audience. The book's genuine contribution lies in its challenge to reductionist nutrition science and its insistence that whole dietary patterns matter more than isolated nutrients. Those who want a book that engages substantively with counterarguments, or who approach it expecting settled consensus science, should be aware that the broader nutrition literature does not uniformly support every conclusion the Campbells draw, and that its correlational data have attracted sustained methodological critique.
Similar books
Readers who respond to The China Study's plant-based thesis will find a natural companion in Forks Over Knives by Gene Stone, which covers much of the same dietary territory in an accessible, advocacy-driven format. For those drawn to the population-level perspective, Dan Buettner's The Blue Zones examines long-lived communities around the world and identifies shared dietary patterns — without the single-framework certainty of the Campbells. Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food offers a more measured, pluralistic argument for eating whole foods while engaging with the complexity of nutritional science rather than dismissing it. For a contrasting perspective on longevity and diet — one that engages more directly with recent clinical evidence and takes a less categorical stance on animal products — Peter Attia's Outlive makes for a thought-provoking counterpart. Michael Moss's Salt Sugar Fat examines how the food industry engineered processed foods, providing useful industrial context for the Campbells' case against the standard Western diet.
Who should read this?
The China Study is designed for general readers interested in the relationship between diet and long-term health — particularly those who are curious about plant-based eating or who want a research-grounded rationale for reducing or eliminating animal products. Readers who have already adopted a whole-food, plant-based diet will find the Campbells' framework provides a structured scientific argument for their choices. Those who prefer to weigh multiple competing nutritional frameworks, or who want a book that engages substantively with counterarguments, may find the book's confident, prosecutorial tone less satisfying.
What are the book's boldest claims?
The book's most striking assertion is that eating foods containing any dietary cholesterol above 0 mg is unhealthy — a claim that goes further than mainstream dietary guidelines. The Campbells also argue that a whole-food, vegan diet can not merely slow but actually reverse chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes, and they mount a wholesale dismissal of low-carbohydrate diets such as the Atkins diet. These positions have attracted significant pushback from nutrition researchers who point to more recent clinical evidence that complicates a blanket condemnation of all animal-derived foods.
How contested is the research?
The China Study has been a consistent target of methodological critique since its original 2005 publication. Critics — including nutrition researchers and science writers — have challenged whether the correlational data from the China–Cornell–Oxford Project can support the causal dietary claims the Campbells construct upon it, and whether a study focused on rural Chinese counties in the 1970s can be extrapolated into universal dietary recommendations. The book is described as 'loosely based' on the China–Cornell–Oxford Project, and the Campbells' confident single-framework stance leaves little room for the genuine complexity and ongoing debate within nutritional science. Readers should approach it as one forceful perspective within an active scientific conversation rather than as settled consensus.
How influential has this book been?
The China Study is widely credited with moving plant-based nutrition from the margins into the mainstream dietary conversation. Originally published in January 2005, it had sold over one million copies in the United States by October 2013, making it one of America's best-selling nutrition books. It has been translated into more than a dozen languages — including German, Polish, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Urdu — reflecting a global reach that extends well beyond the plant-based diet community. As a cultural document, its place in the history of popular nutrition writing is secure regardless of the ongoing scientific debate about its conclusions.
Summarize this book

Summarize this book

The China Study makes a population-level case that consuming animal products — including beef, pork, poultry, fish, eggs, cheese, and milk — is strongly linked to the development of chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and bowel cancer. Drawing on the China–Cornell–Oxford Project, a 20-year epidemiological study spanning 65 counties in China, T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell argue that a whole-food, vegan diet that also minimises processed foods and refined carbohydrates can prevent, reduce, or even reverse these diseases. The book also challenges reductionist nutrition science, arguing that whole dietary patterns and nutrient interactions — not isolated nutrients — are what determine long-term health outcomes. The revised and expanded edition, published by BenBella Books in December 2016, updates the original 2005 text for a contemporary readership.

Follow up

What exactly is the China–Cornell–Oxford Project?
Does the book give practical dietary guidance?
Which edition should I read?

Synthesized from verified book data & published reviews · How we review

Press Enter to ask. Answers come from our editorial Q&A — start typing to see related questions.

Age & Reading Level

Recommended age

Adult

Reading level

Adult

Skip if you want a balanced survey of competing nutritional frameworks that engages fairly with counterarguments.

Editorial Review

First published in 2005 and revised in 2016, The China Study by T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell makes an ambitious, data-driven case that a whole-food, plant-based diet can prevent and even reverse chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, diabetes, and several cancers — a thesis that has made it one of America's best-selling books about nutrition while also generating sustained scientific debate.

Read the Full Review

Books like The China Study

Curated picks for readers who enjoyed The China Study, with our reasoning for each match.

If you liked The China Study

The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss, and Long-Term Health by T. Colin Campbell and Thomas M. Campbell | LuvemBooks