Skip to content
Reviewed

Read Time

8 min read

Our age bandAdult
Curated & edited by

LuvemBooks Editorial

How we create our reviews →
Share This Review
Front cover of Who Knew?: A Continuation of You Never Know

Our review

Who Knew?

Who Knew? by Romy Shiller Review: A Scholar's Clear-Eyed Memoir Continuation

Who Knew? Is Romy Shiller's follow-up to You Never Know: A Memoir, applying her academic work on the body to life after a brain tumour operation, a five-month coma, and lasting disability. A short, intellectually framed memoir best read after its predecessor.

Our age band: Adultbrain tumour surgery and a five-month coma · acquired physical disability and speech impediment (dysarthria)

LuvemBooks Verdict

Best for

Readers of Shiller's first memoir, You Never Know, who want to know what came next — and readers in or around disability studies, body image, and the sociology of the body who value a memoirist with formal scholarly training in exactly those fields.

Worth it if

It's worth reading if you already know the first volume or specifically want disability writing filtered through genuine academic training in gender performance and body scholarship, rather than a general-audience illness memoir.

Skip if

Skip it if you haven't read You Never Know and want a standalone book, or if you're after a conventional diagnosis-crisis-recovery arc — this is framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

Independent critics is essentially absent; the most substantive commentary comes from a small number of sympathetic Amazon.ca readers, who describe a continuation centred on acceptance, "blending realities," and fluctuation and adaptation as important qualities. The publisher's description on Trafford frames Shiller as "a medical mystery" who applies her scholarly work on the body to her new physical reality, driven by her belief that challenges can be met and overcome.

Sources: Amazon.ca, Trafford Publishing

Ask LuvemBooks

Was this helpful?

Who Knew? is Romy Shiller's 124-page follow-up to You Never Know, in which the pop culture critic and Drama PhD applies her scholarly work on the body to life after a brain tumour operation, a five-month coma, and lasting disability. LuvemBooks finds it a short, intellectually driven continuation best suited to readers of the first memoir and those interested in disability studies and the sociology of the body — with the key caveat that it cannot stand alone and its available commentary comes from a small, sympathetic reader base rather than independent criticism.
Is it worth reading?
For the right reader, yes — LuvemBooks finds its clearest asset is its refusal to separate the mind from the circumstance: a scholar of gender performance and the body turning that analysis on herself gives the memoir an intellectual through-line most illness narratives lack. The caveats are real, though: at 124 pages it is brief, it depends entirely on having read You Never Know first, and the available reader commentary comes from a small, sympathetic base rather than independent reviewers. Readers of the first memoir, or those working around disability studies and body image, will get the most from it.
Similar books
The natural companion is Shiller's own You Never Know: A Memoir, which this volume continues. For other memoirs of medicine and altered bodies, LuvemBooks pairs it with When Breath Becomes Air by Paul Kalanithi, a neurosurgeon's reckoning with his own terminal diagnosis; My Stroke of Insight by Jill Bolte Taylor, a brain scientist's account of her own stroke; and No Time Like the Future by Michael J. Fox, on optimism in the face of ongoing illness. Readers drawn to the resilience and personal-growth dimension might also consider Cheryl Strayed's Wild.
Who should read this?
LuvemBooks identifies two ideal audiences: readers of You Never Know who want to know what came next for Shiller, and readers working in or around disability studies, body image, and the sociology of the body who value a memoirist with formal scholarly credentials in exactly those areas. One Amazon.ca reader notes that newcomers to her work would not detect her physical limitations on the page — she appears as critic and scholar first, not "a body-in-circumstance."
Where should I start with this author?
Unquestionably You Never Know: A Memoir. Who Knew? announces itself as a continuation in its subtitle, and the review is explicit that readers who haven't read the first volume enter mid-story. The first memoir establishes the medical events — the brain tumour operation and five-month coma — that the second volume examines through Shiller's scholarly framework.
How is it different from typical illness memoirs?
Method rather than event. Most illness memoirs follow diagnosis, crisis, and recovery; Who Knew? instead applies Shiller's academic work on the body — gender performance, film, camp, critical thought — to her own lived experience of disability. The concept of drag, the subject of her PhD thesis, surfaces in reader accounts as important to her framework, and the book is structured around ongoing adaptation rather than cure, giving it an argument instead of a diary shape.
How much weight should reader reviews carry?
Proceed with caution. The most substantive commentary available comes from a small number of Amazon.ca reviews, and one of the most detailed was written by a reader who describes becoming internet friends with Shiller after her first book. That is engaged, sympathetic readership rather than detached criticism — consistent with the book's stated design, but prospective buyers should calibrate expectations rather than treating it as broad critical consensus.
Summarize this book

Summarize this book

Who Knew? is Romy Shiller's second memoir, published in hardcover by Trafford Publishing in March 2010, continuing the story begun in You Never Know. After a non-malignant brain tumour operation and a five-month coma left her in a wheelchair with dysarthria, Shiller — a Drama PhD whose concentrations include gender performance, film, and camp — applies her scholarly work on the body to her own new physical reality. The publisher frames the 124-page book around her conviction that challenges can be met and overcome, and readers describe encountering a deeper, more mature writer engaging with memory, being seen as one is, and resilience.

Follow up

How long is the book?
What happened to the author?
Does it work as a standalone?

Synthesized from verified book data & published reviews · How we review

Ask LuvemBooks

What would you like to know about Who Knew??

Answers come from our editorial notes on this book. If we haven't covered something, we'll say so.

Readers often ask

Our Review

We review the evidence: published critics, reader verdicts and BookTube reviews, gathered and weighed with AI assistance and edited by LuvemBooks, rather than one reader's first-hand take.

A compact, intellectually driven sequel memoir, Who Knew? Rewards readers who want disability writing filtered through genuine scholarly training — though its brevity and dependence on the first volume limit it as a standalone.

What the Book Is

Who Knew?: A Continuation of You Never Know: A Memoir is exactly what its subtitle announces: the second volume of Romy Shiller's memoir, published in hardcover by Trafford Publishing in March 2010 and running to 124 pages. Shiller, a pop culture critic who holds a PhD in Drama from the University of Toronto, writes from a radically altered life.
According to the publisher, a non-malignant brain tumour operation and a subsequent five-month coma left her in a wheelchair with dysarthria, a speech impediment. The publisher describes her as "a medical mystery" and frames the book around her conviction that challenges can be met and overcome — the stated reason she wrote it.

The Scholar's Lens on the Body

What distinguishes this memoir, per its own record, is method rather than event. Shiller's academic concentrations include film, gender performance, camp, and critical thought, and the publisher's description stresses that she applies her previous scholarly work on the body to her new physical reality.
Readers on Amazon.ca who came to the book via the first memoir describe encountering "a deeper, more mature Romy" who continues her life as a writer, academic, and pop culture critic and turns those skills on her own situation. One reader there highlights themes of being remembered, of disliking not being seen as one is, and of resistance to being judged — alongside optimism and humour.
The concept of "drag," the subject of Shiller's PhD thesis, also surfaces in that reader's account as important to her framework. These are reader impressions rather than broad critical consensus, but they are consistent with the book's stated design: lived experience examined through the tools of body scholarship.

Strengths Worth Naming

The book's clearest asset is its refusal to separate the mind from the circumstance. Per the publisher, Shiller continues writing from Montreal, and the memoir positions her as a critic and scholar first — not, as one Amazon.ca reader puts it, "a body-in-circumstance."
For readers concerned with body image, the sociology of the body, difference, or personal growth, that same reader calls it a worthwhile book and notes that newcomers to her work would not detect her physical limitations on the page. The premise itself — a scholar of gender performance and the body forced to reckon with her own — gives the memoir an intellectual through-line that most illness narratives lack, and the author's explicit framing of adaptability and fluctuation as important qualities supplies a clear argument rather than a loose diary.

Limitations to Weigh

At 124 pages, this is a brief volume, and its title is literal: it is a continuation, and readers who have not read You Never Know will be entering mid-story. The published record centres on what the book sets out to do rather than on independent critical assessment; the most substantive reader commentary available comes from a small number of Amazon.ca reviews, one written by someone who describes having become internet friends with the author after her first book.
That is engaged, sympathetic readership rather than detached criticism, and prospective buyers should calibrate expectations accordingly. Readers seeking a conventional narrative arc — diagnosis, crisis, recovery, resolution — should also note that the book is framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

Who It Is For

Who Knew? Is best suited to readers of the first memoir who want to know what came next, and to those working in or reading around disability studies, body image, and the sociology of the body who value a memoirist with formal scholarly credentials in exactly those areas.
It is a short, purpose-driven continuation rather than an entry point — a book whose interest lies in watching an academic trained to analyse the body turn that analysis on herself.

Sources & Further Reading

The key facts and claims in this review are grounded in the retrieved, verified sources listed below.

  1. Cited in this review
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Further reading
  5. 3

    trafford.com

  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7

Age & Reading Level

Our age band

Adult

Our age band groups books for browsing; it isn't an age a review gave.

Content to know about

brain tumour surgery and a five-month coma
acquired physical disability and speech impediment (dysarthria)

Skip if you haven't read You Never Know and want a standalone memoir with a conventional diagnosis-to-recovery arc — this is a brief continuation framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

From our readers

Reader reviews

Be one of the first readers to answer.

Read it? Was it right for you?

Discussion

Reader comments