BOOKS
Published

Read Time

9 min read

Curated & edited by

LuvemBooks Editorial

How we create our reviews →
Share This Review

Our review

A Wind in the Door by Madeleine L'Engle Review: Bold, Ambitious Science Fantasy Sequel

A Wind in the Door is a young adult science fantasy novel by Madeleine L'Engle, the second entry in the Time Quintet, in which fourteen-year-old Meg Murry races to save her gravely ill brother Charles Wallace by journeying inside his very cells. Its audacious blend of cosmic mythology, cellular biology, and moral urgency makes it one of the most inventive entries in the genre.

LuvemBooks Verdict

Best for

Readers aged 9 and up — and curious adults — who are drawn to ideas as much as adventure and want a young adult fantasy that treats cellular biology, classical theology, and cosmic ethics as equally serious narrative languages.

Worth it if

Worth reading if you relish ambitious science fantasy that scales from a child's mitochondria to the fate of the universe, and you're willing to meet a genuinely alien cherubim, a villain that is literally a void, and a moral test rooted in learning to love someone you actively dislike.

Skip if

Skip it if you need your allegory tightly integrated and your protagonist's emotional transformation to feel earned rather than arrived at — Kirkus Reviews' original 1973 notice found that Meg learns to love the universe and her antagonist with unconvincing ease, and that the novel strains to connect contemporary American social ills to the metaphysics of farandolae.

Kirkus Reviews, in its original 1973 notice, acknowledged the audacity of L'Engle's mytho-scientific imagination and her storytelling abilities as the engine driving the quest, while also noting that Meg's transformation arrives with unconvincing ease and that the novel strains unusually hard to connect what's wrong with America to the double-talk of mitochondria and farandolae. Wikipedia's reception entry records that Michele Murray wrote in critical coverage that L'Engle "mixes classical theology, contemporary family life, and futuristic science fiction to make a completely convincing tale," and that a 2012 Tor.com essay by Mari Ness called it "L'Engle at the height of her poetic powers."

“The audacity of L'Engle's mytho-scientific imagination and her undoubted storytelling abilities keep readers engaged in Meg's quest.”

— Kirkus Reviews
Sources: Kirkus Reviews, Wikipedia, Common Sense Media, eyrie.org, readerthoughts.com, readathomemom.com

Age & Reading Level

Recommended age

Ages 12–18

Reading level

Young adult

Content to know about

existential annihilation (characters 'Xed' out of existence)
death of a sympathetic major character
bullying of a child

Best for: Ages 12+ — abstract theological and scientific concepts (cellular biology as cosmic metaphor, the ethics of loving an enemy) suit confident YA readers rather than younger children

Skip if you want tightly integrated allegory where every symbolic thread resolves cleanly

In This Review
  • What Works & What Doesn't
  • What the Story Actually Is
  • The Scope of L'Engle's Mytho-Scientific Imagination
  • Emotional and Moral Stakes
  • Where Critics Found Friction
  • Its Place in the Canon and Who It Rewards

What Works & What Doesn't

What Works
  • L'Engle's mytho-scientific imagination — linking cellular biology to cosmic evil — is genuinely audacious and unlike anything else in young adult fantasy
  • The emotional core, Meg's forced reckoning with her dislike of Mr. Jenkins, grounds the cosmic stakes in a believable moral struggle
  • Proginoskes is a richly original creation, recasting the cherubim as a many-eyed extraterrestrial being with real narrative weight
  • Critics including Michele Murray in critics praised it as a completely convincing blend of theology, family life, and science fiction
  • Mari Ness at Tor.com called it 'L'Engle at the height of her poetic powers,' pointing to its underappreciated ambition
What Doesn't
  • Kirkus Reviews found that Meg's transformation — learning to love the universe and her antagonist — arrives with unconvincing ease, undercutting the novel's emotional arc
  • The attempt to connect America's social ills to the metaphysics of mitochondria and farandolae can feel strained, as Kirkus noted in its original 1973 review
A companion book to A Wrinkle in Time deserves to be judged on its own terms — and A Wind in the Door earns that right.
A Wind in the Door by Madeleine L'Engle front cover
A Wind in the Door by Madeleine L'Engle front cover

What the Story Actually Is

Published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (first in 1973, with later printings following), A Wind in the Door centers on fourteen-year-old Meg Murry and the slow-building crisis surrounding her six-year-old brother Charles Wallace, a child genius who is being bullied at school and is also falling mysteriously ill. Their mother, a microbiologist, traces the illness to a dysfunction of his farandolae — fictional organelles nested within his mitochondria. What begins as a domestic story of sibling anxiety and schoolyard cruelty quickly scales outward: Meg, Charles Wallace, and their sixteen-year-old friend Calvin O'Keefe discover that a "drive of dragons" Charles Wallace reported in their backyard is in fact an extraterrestrial cherubim named Proginoskes (nicknamed Progo by Meg), operating under the guidance of a vast humanoid Teacher called Blajeny. The three are recruited to oppose the Echthroi — a malevolent cosmic force that manifests on Earth as hatred, destruction, and war — who are actively destroying Charles Wallace from the inside by convincing his farandolae not to mature.
“seems to be straining unusually hard to relate what's wrong with America to the double-talk phenomenon of mitochondria and farandolae.”

The Scope of L'Engle's Mytho-Scientific Imagination

The novel's most distinctive quality is the sheer scale of its conceptual ambition. L'Engle links the subatomic to the cosmic: the fate of one child's mitochondria is inseparable from the health of the universe. Kirkus Reviews, in its original 1973 notice, acknowledged "the audacity of Ms. L'Engle's mytho-scientific imagination and her undoubted storytelling abilities" as the engine keeping readers engaged in Meg's quest. The Echthroi function simultaneously as a scientific metaphor and a theological one — a void that "Xs" things out of existence — while Proginoskes, a many-eyed, many-winged cherubim of extraterrestrial origin, recasts angelic tradition in genuinely alien terms. This willingness to treat cellular biology and ancient cosmology as compatible narrative languages is what separates the book from more conventional fantasy sequels.

Emotional and Moral Stakes

Where A Wrinkle in Time sent Meg across the universe to rescue her father, this installment turns the quest inward and interpersonal. Meg's central trial is not a physical battle but an act of moral perception: she must identify the real Mr. Jenkins — her longtime antagonist and now Charles Wallace's unsympathetic school principal — from two Echthroi doubles, doing so by locating the genuine goodness in a man she actively dislikes. The novel then takes Meg, Calvin, and Mr. Jenkins on a journey inside one of Charles Wallace's mitochondria, where they must persuade a larval farandola named Sporos to accept its role as a mature fara. Meg herself is nearly annihilated — "Xed" — and Proginoskes ultimately sacrifices himself to fill the emptiness left by the Echthroi, saving Charles Wallace. The emotional weight of that sacrifice gives the climax a gravity that transcends the plot's strangeness.

Where Critics Found Friction

A Wind in the Door is not without its detractors, and the criticisms are specific. Kirkus noted that "Meg learns to love the universe with unconvincing ease," and found that L'Engle "seems to be straining unusually hard to relate what's wrong with America to the double-talk phenomenon of mitochondria and farandolae." The thematic architecture — personal redemption, cosmic evil, and contemporary social critique woven together — can feel overstretched, particularly when the novel reaches for broad cultural diagnosis. Kirkus also observed, with some wry skepticism, that the book's appeal may partly rest on the universal fantasy of believing one's ordinary antagonists are agents of cosmic malevolence: a seductive idea that the novel never fully interrogates. These are genuine tensions in the text, not minor quibbles, and readers who prefer tightly integrated allegory may notice the strain.

Its Place in the Canon and Who It Rewards

Despite those reservations, the novel has attracted serious defenders. As Wikipedia's reception summary records, Michele Murray wrote in The New York Times that L'Engle "mixes classical theology, contemporary family life, and futuristic science fiction to make a completely convincing tale that should put under its spell both readers familiar with the Murrys and those meeting them for the first time." And in a 2012 essay for Tor.com, author and critic Mari Ness called it "L'Engle at the height of her poetic powers," lamenting that "the failure of this book to receive the same attention and fame as its predecessor is a genuine shame." Readers coming directly from A Wrinkle in Time will find the Murry family and Calvin O'Keefe fully established; those new to the series have a workable entry point, though the emotional resonance deepens with familiarity. The novel rewards young readers drawn to ideas — theology, biology, the ethics of love — as much as to adventure, and it remains one of the more philosophically serious works in the young adult science fantasy tradition.

Sources & Further Reading

The key facts and claims in this review are grounded in the retrieved, verified sources listed below.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7