BOOKS
Published

Read Time

8 min read

Curated & edited by

LuvemBooks Editorial

How we create our reviews →
Share This Review

Who Knew? by Romy Shiller Review: A Scholar's Clear-Eyed Memoir Continuation

Who Knew? Is Romy Shiller's follow-up to You Never Know: A Memoir, applying her academic work on the body to life after a brain tumour operation, a five-month coma, and lasting disability. A short, intellectually framed memoir best read after its predecessor.

LuvemBooks Verdict

Best for

Readers of Shiller's first memoir, You Never Know, who want to know what came next — and readers in or around disability studies, body image, and the sociology of the body who value a memoirist with formal scholarly training in exactly those fields.

Worth it if

It's worth reading if you already know the first volume or specifically want disability writing filtered through genuine academic training in gender performance and body scholarship, rather than a general-audience illness memoir.

Skip if

Skip it if you haven't read You Never Know and want a standalone book, or if you're after a conventional diagnosis-crisis-recovery arc — this is framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

Independent critical coverage is essentially absent; the most substantive commentary comes from a small number of sympathetic Amazon.ca readers, who describe a continuation centred on acceptance, "blending realities," and fluctuation and adaptation as important qualities. The publisher's description on Trafford frames Shiller as "a medical mystery" who applies her scholarly work on the body to her new physical reality, driven by her belief that challenges can be met and overcome.

Sources: Amazon.ca, Trafford Publishing

Age & Reading Level

Recommended age

Adult

Reading level

Adult

Content to know about

brain tumour surgery and a five-month coma
acquired physical disability and speech impediment (dysarthria)

Skip if you haven't read You Never Know and want a standalone memoir with a conventional diagnosis-to-recovery arc — this is a brief continuation framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

In This Review
  • What Works & What Doesn't
  • What the Book Is
  • The Scholar's Lens on the Body
  • Strengths Worth Naming
  • Limitations to Weigh
  • Who It Is For

What Works & What Doesn't

What Works
  • Applies the author's genuine scholarly expertise on the body — PhD in Drama, with concentrations in gender performance, film, and camp — to her own lived experience of disability
  • Clear motivating premise: the publisher frames the book around Shiller's conviction that challenges can be met and overcome, giving it an argument rather than a diary shape
  • Amazon.ca readers who followed from the first memoir describe a deeper, more mature continuation touching on memory, being seen as one is, and resilience
  • Continues the author's identity as writer, academic, and pop culture critic rather than reducing her to her medical circumstance
What Doesn't
  • A direct continuation — readers who haven't read You Never Know: A Memoir enter mid-story
  • At 124 pages it is a brief volume
  • Available commentary comes from a small, sympathetic reader base rather than independent critical coverage
A compact, intellectually driven sequel memoir, Who Knew? Rewards readers who want disability writing filtered through genuine scholarly training — though its brevity and dependence on the first volume limit it as a standalone.
Who Knew?: A Continuation of You Never Know: A Memoir by Romy Shiller front cover
Who Knew?: A Continuation of You Never Know: A Memoir by Romy Shiller front cover

What the Book Is

Who Knew?: A Continuation of You Never Know: A Memoir is exactly what its subtitle announces: the second volume of Romy Shiller's memoir, published in hardcover by Trafford Publishing in March 2010 and running to 124 pages. Shiller, a pop culture critic who holds a PhD in Drama from the University of Toronto, writes from a radically altered life. According to the publisher, a non-malignant brain tumour operation and a subsequent five-month coma left her in a wheelchair with dysarthria, a speech impediment. The publisher describes her as "a medical mystery" and frames the book around her conviction that challenges can be met and overcome — the stated reason she wrote it.

The Scholar's Lens on the Body

What distinguishes this memoir, per its own record, is method rather than event. Shiller's academic concentrations include film, gender performance, camp, and critical thought, and the publisher's description stresses that she applies her previous scholarly work on the body to her new physical reality. Readers on Amazon.ca who came to the book via the first memoir describe encountering "a deeper, more mature Romy" who continues her life as a writer, academic, and pop culture critic and turns those skills on her own situation. One reader there highlights themes of being remembered, of disliking not being seen as one is, and of resistance to being judged — alongside optimism and humour. The concept of "drag," the subject of Shiller's PhD thesis, also surfaces in that reader's account as important to her framework. These are reader impressions rather than broad critical consensus, but they are consistent with the book's stated design: lived experience examined through the tools of body scholarship.

Strengths Worth Naming

The book's clearest asset is its refusal to separate the mind from the circumstance. Per the publisher, Shiller continues writing from Montreal, and the memoir positions her as a critic and scholar first — not, as one Amazon.ca reader puts it, "a body-in-circumstance." For readers concerned with body image, the sociology of the body, difference, or personal growth, that same reader calls it a worthwhile book and notes that newcomers to her work would not detect her physical limitations on the page. The premise itself — a scholar of gender performance and the body forced to reckon with her own — gives the memoir an intellectual through-line that most illness narratives lack, and the author's explicit framing of adaptability and fluctuation as important qualities supplies a clear argument rather than a loose diary.

Limitations to Weigh

At 124 pages, this is a brief volume, and its title is literal: it is a continuation, and readers who have not read You Never Know will be entering mid-story. The published record centres on what the book sets out to do rather than on independent critical assessment; the most substantive reader commentary available comes from a small number of Amazon.ca reviews, one written by someone who describes having become internet friends with the author after her first book. That is engaged, sympathetic readership rather than detached criticism, and prospective buyers should calibrate expectations accordingly. Readers seeking a conventional narrative arc — diagnosis, crisis, recovery, resolution — should also note that the book is framed around ongoing adaptation, not cure.

Who It Is For

Who Knew? Is best suited to readers of the first memoir who want to know what came next, and to those working in or reading around disability studies, body image, and the sociology of the body who value a memoirist with formal scholarly credentials in exactly those areas. It is a short, purpose-driven continuation rather than an entry point — a book whose interest lies in watching an academic trained to analyse the body turn that analysis on herself.

Sources & Further Reading

The key facts and claims in this review are grounded in the retrieved, verified sources listed below.

  1. Cited in this review
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Further reading
  5. 3

    trafford.com

  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7